In the early spring of 1976, as young engineers Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak hatched their personal-computing revolution in Jobs’s parents’ garage, a more cautious figure walked into the picture. Ronald Wayne, then 41, was invited in, not because he had revolutionary ideas or an appetite for Silicon Valley risk, but because Jobs and Wozniak needed someone the investors and creditors could trust: an “adult in the room.” Wayne drew up the initial partnership agreement, created the company’s first logo, and even wrote the manual for the Apple I. Then, just 12 days later, he left, selling his 10 % stake back to his co-founders for roughly $800.

Today, Apple is worth trillions of dollars, and analysts say that Wayne’s 10 % stake would have been worth billions if he had stayed. But before you call it the story of the “biggest startup mistake ever,” it’s worth noting something: Wayne didn’t regret walking away. He believed he had made the right decision based on the information he had at the time.

For startup founders, Wayne’s decision holds a special kind of mirror. It asks: When you’re part of something big, but not necessarily all-in, how do you know whether to hold on or let go?

Learning from Wayne’s choice

When Wayne joined Apple on April 1, 1976, he accepted a 10 % equity stake compared with Jobs and Wozniak’s 45 % each. He was the corporate draftsman and paperwork man; they were the dreamers, the engineers, the salesmen. Wayne’s main concern? Personal financial liability. Under a partnership structure, he would have been exposed to any debts the company incurred. And at that moment: Wozniak and Jobs were both young, low-asset, risk-taking engineers; Wayne had a house, savings, a depleted prior business behind him, a slot-machine venture that failed. In essence, he had more to lose.

So Wayne sold. He chose personal stability over the possibility of spectacular upside. What made that choice complicated, and what makes it still relevant, was that Wayne knew Apple had potential, but he did not believe he would or could stick with the ride. He said: “I had every belief [Apple] would be successful, but at the same time there could be significant bumps along the way and I couldn’t risk it. … It was like having a tiger by the tail.”

Wayne’s story offers startup founders three key decision-points to keep in mind when they face “sell vs hold” questions.

1. How much risk do you bear?

Founders often assume their personal and company risks are aligned, but they may not be. Wayne’s case illustrates how one founder’s risk profile can differ dramatically from the rest (or from what the company needs). He had more to lose personally, and less appetite for the wild ride.

For a founder today: Acknowledge your personal position. Do you have assets at stake? Are you financially dependent on the outcome? Are you emotionally ready to ride the roller-coaster of growth, pivoting, dilution, long hours, and uncertainty? If the answer is “I’m not sure,” then the right decision may not always be “hang on tighter.”

The decision to sell doesn’t mean the idea has no value. It means that your participation in that value might not match the value you’re willing to trade.

2. When are you in vs when are you on the ride?

Wayne’s role was different. He was brought in for structure, not for product innovation or growth hacking. He realised that while Apple’s future might be big, his future wasn’t. He did not identify as someone who wanted to scale the company for decades.

Many startup founders get swept up in growth momentum before asking this question: “Am I the driver or the passenger?” If you’re the driver, you’re ready to commit long-term: you’ll give up sleep, income, relationships, certain options. If you’re the passenger, someone who wants to see growth, reap benefits, but not dominate your life, you’re choosing a different form of value.

Wayne’s decision to exit early might be framed as “missing out,” but from his perspective it was entirely consistent with his values and his appetite for risk.

3. Recognise your “hold vs sell” window

Timing is everything. Wayne left extremely early, just days after the formation, but in a sense that clarity of purpose gave him the freedom to exit without regret. Founders rarely gain that clarity later, when more capital is committed.

If you’re debating whether to hang on or sell your share, ask:

1. Has the company’s direction shifted from what you signed up for?
2. Are you still adding unique value, or is the company evolving beyond your skills or passion?
3. Are your personal life, financial goals, or risk tolerance changing?

If you answer “yes” to any of these, you may be in your exit window.

Selling doesn’t always mean failure. It can mean deploying your value elsewhere. The key is not to sell because you feel the pressure to exit prematurely, sell because your contribution, your value, your stint in that company has reached its logical end.

What founders should do when they’re pressured to sell prematurely

Many founders face external pressure: investors urging liquidity events, boards pushing for acquisition, personal burnout, or divergent visions. Here’s how to handle that with strategic clarity:

First, clarify your role
Document what you believed your role to be when you joined, and what it has become. If you started as a product designer, but you’re now primarily managing investors or legal compliance, ask whether that suits your skills and ambitions.

Second, revisit your equity and value alignment
Your share isn’t just a number, it’s a reflection of future value, commitment and risk. If the company is heading into a growth phase you cannot or will not participate in, your effective stake is lower.

Third, set an exit roadmap
If you decide to exit, plan for how and when, and under what conditions. You’ll want to maximise value but not stay too long if your heart is no longer in it, or you’re holding back the company.

Fourth, communicate openly
If you feel pressure to sell, speak plainly with investors, co-founders, advisors. Say: “Here’s the path I can serve. Here’s what I believe the company needs next. Here’s my personal timeline.” Framing your departure as a strategic decision, not a panic move, preserves relationships and goodwill.

Fifth, treat the decision as strategic, not reactive
Wayne didn’t flee because Apple failed, he exited because the risk and opportunity didn’t match his profile. As a founder you should ask: Is this decision serving the company and me?

Avoiding the regret of “I should’ve held”

Regret is the heaviest burden of all. Wayne reportedly said that if he had known how big Apple would become, he might have stayed four years, then exited. But he balanced that with “I still would have walked away.” Because he knew his own values.

To avoid that regret you need three things:

1. Clarity of values: know why you joined the venture and what you want from it.
2. Honest appraisal: ask whether you believe in the journey enough to stay the course, not just for the payoff but for the work required.
3. Proactive planning: whether staying or exiting, plan your participation. When you leave isn’t dictated solely by external events, it’s a strategic choice you make.

Final thought for startup founders

Ronald Wayne’s story is often told as the tragic “what if” of missing billions. But for founders it holds a richer lesson: knowing when to hold, and when to let go, is itself a form of value creation.

As your startup grows, revisit three questions:

1. Is your role still aligned with yourself?
2. Are you still adding unique value?
3. Is your risk and reward profile compatible with what the venture needs, and what you want?

When you can answer “yes” to all three, you’re in a good position to hold. If one of them flips to “no,” it might be time to make a strategic exit.

‍

Read - How Startups Can Hedge Against the “Superstar Dilemma”: Lessons from Elon Musk’s Record-Breaking Tesla Pay Package