In the early days of a startup, it’s tempting to chase what’s “buzzing” — the latest platform feature, the hottest consumer app, the new content format. You tell yourself, “If only we built that, we’d capture attention, growth, funding.” But over time, chasing trends often leads more founders astray than it propels them forward. What separates companies that truly last is the ability to build something people depend on, not something they glance at.

Let me walk you through why trend-chasing is dangerous, how it has felled many promising tech startups, and,  more importantly, how founders can shift to building products that matter. This isn’t a surface treatment of strategy; it’s a mental model and a set of design moves you can adopt starting today.

Why Trend-Chasing Feels Right and Why It Isn’t

Trends seduce because they promise what every startup craves: visibility, speed, and external validation. If you launch a snazzy AR filter or ride a new social algorithm, you can suddenly get press, users, and investor calls. It feels like momentum.

But that momentum is often hollow. Too many startups win the headline and lose the user. What I call “trend chasing” is using external novelty as a substitute for depth. And in a world of shifting algorithms and fickle attention, those substitutes collapse.

The evidence is consistent. In the CB Insights analysis of startup post-mortems, the most cited reason for failure is lack of market need, meaning the product failed to address a real, persistent problem. That’s the #1 failure cause, ahead of running out of cash or team dysfunction.

A more recent academic breakdown of 353 startup post-mortems reinforces similar drivers: product/market misfit, weak business model, and inability to sustain capital are recurring culprits.

In short, attention can give you a spark, but not a foundation. And when attention fades, as it always does, you’re left with a product that doesn't matter.

When Trend-Chasing Crushed Tech Startups

To bring this to life, let’s examine familiar names and lessons. These are cautionary tales, not to shame, but to show what’s at stake when you prioritize “what’s hot” over “what’s needed.”

Quibi. Backed by about $1.75 billion in funding, Quibi was designed to deliver high-production short videos strictly for mobile viewing. But six months in, it quietly shut down. Quibi’s failure came from multiple missteps: launching in a pandemic when few were mobile-first, misreading consumption patterns, and lacking strong social or sharing hooks. The product was built to be trendy rather than useful. (See failure summary in Forbes “Lessons from Quibi’s Failure”)

Juicero. This is a favorite caution among product teams. Juicero sold a sleek, internet-connected juicer machine along with proprietary product packs. The twist: a Bloomberg teardown revealed that the packs could be squeezed by hand, rendering the $400 machine nearly redundant. Once that truth was public, investors pulled back, and the business folded in under two years. What looked like elegant hardware was, in fact, an expensive trend play without defensible leverage.

“Juicero has since become something of a symbol of the absurd Silicon Valley startup industry that raises huge sums of money for solutions to non-problems.” The Guardian, Squeezed out: widely mocked startup Juicero is shutting down)

Vine. As an originator of ultra-short, looping videos, Vine captured public imagination. But over time, monetization, creator incentives, and distribution challenges eroded its value. Eventually, Twitter shut it down; virality alone didn’t carry the weight of a sustainable business.

These stories share a common thread: visibility momentarily outpaces depth, but when the lights dim, only real market value holds.

What It Means to Build Products That Matter

If trends are the flashy fireworks, then lasting products are the infrastructure, the bridges that remain long after the display. A product that matters solves a real, persistent user problem, and then compounds value over time through defensible mechanisms (data, network effects, vendor lock-in, etc.).

“Matters” doesn’t mean everyone wants it today. It means some users will return, again and again, because the product is useful and solves a real problem.

Let me show you how founders can build toward that.

Building Depth: Shifting from Trend to Substance

I’ll walk you through the key shifts in mindset and design that separate trend-driven fads from foundational products.

1. Solve persistent, high-impact pain

Instead of chasing what’s trending, start with problems that won’t vanish. Ask: Will this problem exist in 3–5 years, even if consumer tastes shift? Prioritize pain that people are already paying for (directly or indirectly) or working around inefficiently. When you find users who already have to work around, that’s evidence of enduring pain.

For example, early Slack didn’t chase the trend of chatbots or shiny “social” features. It anchored on a simple, persistent problem: communication and context lost in email. That allowed deliberate buildup of features over time.

2. Anchor every decision in mission constraints

Your mission shouldn’t be a promotional tagline. It should act like a filter. Define, in one sentence, who you’re serving, the outcome you enable, and over what horizon. Then, require that any roadmap item must move the mission metric in a reasonable window. If not, scrap it.

This rigidity keeps you from chasing every shiny possibility.

3. Build compounding advantages, not one-time spikes

Trends give you spikes; compounding advantages give you slopes. Seek levers that get stronger as you grow: user behavior data, shared platform norms, partnerships, or integrations with core enterprise workflows.

Over time, every feature you ship should feed into that compounding engine. This pushes you away from chasing random features and toward building a defensible moat.

4. Prioritize retention over acquisition

Too many teams obsess over growth channels first. But it doesn’t matter how many people sign up if they don’t stick. Focus first on making the product so good that users come back without prompting. Define the core action, the smallest behavior that captures the product’s value, and optimize onboarding toward getting users to that core action immediately.

Once retention is solid, channels become amplifiers, not crutches.

5. Test monetization early (even imperfectly)

Don’t wait for scale to find out whether your product can pay for itself. Launch minimal paid experiments or premium features early with your power users. The feedback you get is far more valuable than a user growth metric, because without monetization, scale is a mirage.

6. Reduce your external dependencies

When your product’s life depends on someone else’s distribution algorithm or ownership, you lose control. If 70% of your traffic arrives from one social feed, you’re sitting on borrowed runway. Instead, build direct relationships via email, accounts, billing, or integrations you control. Over time, owning the user interface between you and the customer is the difference between resilience and collapse.

7. Institutionalize disciplined experiments

Stop responding reactively to competitors’ shiny features. Instead, run hypothesis-driven experiments with clear metrics, timelines, and criteria for “kill” or “iterate.” Maintain a regular cadence (weekly, monthly) to evaluate, but don’t pivot wildly. Oscillations waste runway, experiments preserve it.

When these shifts become part of your rhythm, the product you build will matter more than the trends you ignore.

Modern Examples That Chose Depth Over Hype

It’s one thing to describe the theory; it’s another to see it in action. Here are tech startups that leaned toward substance, not shine.

Notion. Early on, Notion didn’t chase every productivity trend. It built a flexible workspace tool that solved user pain around fragmentation, tasks, docs, and wikis in disconnected apps. Over time, its modularity, extension ecosystem, and community loop compounded defensibility.

DuckDuckGo. While many search tools try to ride the buzz around AI or “semantic search,” DuckDuckGo stays anchored to privacy as its core mission. Every feature is filtered through that lens. It doesn’t chase every hot search trend; it deepens its value for its niche users.

When companies consistently choose depth over relevance, they get the patience of users and the trust of ecosystems.

Diagnosing Trend-Chasing and The Founder’s Investor Narrative for Durable Growth

You don’t need external observers to tell you if you’re chasing trends; your metrics do. If you find yourself prioritizing features because a competitor launched them, rewarding downloads over retention, or deriving >50% of traffic from a single social feed you don’t own, alarm bells should ring.

Run an internal audit. Score your decisions: Are they driven by external fads or internal mission? Are they evaluated via retention or vanity? The higher your score toward the latter, the more you’re drifting.

A founder worried about durability often worries investors will label the strategy “too slow.” But slow built well is better than fast built brittle.

Frame your narrative around compounding signals, improving retention curves, rising LTV/CAC, declining churn, and profitable cohorts. Don’t just show growth; show how you are making growth more sustainable each month. Funders love hypotheses with experiments, outcomes, and next steps, not just optimistic projections.

Final Thoughts

Attention is volatile; products endure. Trends can help amplify, but they can’t replace foundations. True product creators don’t continuously chase the moment; they work toward a future that customers rely on. Shift your energy from what’s sensational to what’s true, from what fades to what stays. Build the kind of product people return to by habit. That’s how you build a product that matters..

‍

Read - The Art of Building a Luxury Brand: Lessons from Apple, Vertu, Bang & Olufsen, and Leica