Most startup lore celebrates authenticity: “Be yourself. Your users, your team, your brand should feel raw, real, unfiltered.” And yes, authenticity is appealing, especially in an era of personal branding, creator economy, and social media. But that very imperative, to be “true to yourself,” can be destructive in the early, fragile stages of building a company.

This isn’t a call to be fake. Far from it. It’s a nuanced critique: when “being yourself” becomes a rigid credo rather than a guiding compass, it can blind you, limit growth, and alienate customers. As the Harvard Business Review explores in The Authenticity Paradox, overly simplistic authenticity can hamper leadership effectiveness and stymie evolution.

In this article, you will learn how “being yourself” is a double-edged principle for founders. I’ll show where it backfires, examine tech-startup case studies, and then propose a more flexible model: becoming your most generative self. You’ll leave with a refined mindset and mental models to help you avoid authenticity’s traps.

The Allure and the Trap of “Be Yourself”

On the surface, “be yourself” is a powerful rallying cry. It seems to counteract polished corporate personas, elevating vulnerability, originality, and honesty. And to some degree, that’s valid; outsized charisma or uniqueness can differentiate you in saturated markets. But taken as a doctrine, it can become a straitjacket.

Herminia Ibarra, in The Authenticity Paradox, argues that a rigid commitment to one’s “current self”, what feels natural and comfortable, can actually limit growth and lead to leadership missteps. Sometimes the very traits you identify with need to be suspended temporarily to stretch into a new role.

Consider a founder whose style is deeply consensus-oriented and slow to decide. If that founder insists on being themselves, they may fail to make bold bets when urgency demands. The insistence on “true self” becomes an excuse for inaction.

Risk 1: Stagnation disguised as integrity

When you won’t do what doesn’t “feel like you,” you may avoid uncomfortable but necessary changes. You may refuse a market pivot because it clashes with your self-image. Integrity becomes dogma, not principle.

Risk 2: Misalignment with roles and scale

A founder who codes, designs, or sells might enjoy wearing all hats. But as the startup scales, the demands shift. If you cling to what you were originally (the “coder-self” or “boots-on-ground CEO-self”), you may fail to evolve into the version of yourself that suits the company at scale.

Risk 3: Oversharing and loss of authority

Sometimes being “too real” undermines credibility. The Authenticity Paradox describes situations where extreme candor erodes stakeholders’ confidence: transparency isn’t always a virtue if it reduces trust in your ability to lead decisively.

Imagine telling your team every insecurity, every last doubt. That could prevent cohesion or make decisions seem teetering and indecisive. Leaders often need to carry certain ambiguities; disclosing everything can be disempowering.

Risk 4: Locking into one version of identity

“Being yourself” implies a fixed self, a single identity. But humans grow. Founders, especially, evolve as their companies do. If you tie your brand or persona too tightly to your current self, you can’t adapt without feeling like you’re betraying your identity.

Case Studies — Where Being Yourself Hurt More Than Helped

To bring this down to earth, let’s examine a few tech startup or founder stories where rigid authenticity backfired, or where a shift toward a more adaptive self made the difference.

Elon Musk and public persona

Elon Musk is often lauded for being himself, unfiltered, provocative, and direct. That style has attracted enormous attention but also scrutiny, risk, and volatility. Tweets have tanked stock prices, drawn lawsuits, and forced PR recoveries. His brand is inextricably tied to his personality in a way that sometimes overshadows Tesla or SpaceX. While he may thrive in that context, many founders trying to emulate “be yourself loudly” suffer reputational whiplash.

The early GitHub founder shift

GitHub started as a small tool-run collective of developers. Its founders were deeply embedded in dev culture and prided themselves on a hacker ethos. Over time, to grow in enterprise markets, they had to soften, polish, and adopt different behaviors,

from sales discipline to polished roadmaps. Clinging only to hacker authenticity would have limited their climb into corporate adoption. This shift often requires suppressing some bits of your “natural” self to adopt traits your future role demands.

A Better Lens: Evolve into Your “Most Generative Self”

Rather than “be yourself,” I propose the idea of becoming your most generative self. That phrasing captures both truth and transformation. Generative implies creating, evolving, producing. It’s not about a fixed identity, but a forward-leaning one.

Here’s how that mindset works for founders:

1. Embrace that leadership roles demand new selves.
2. Use small experiments to practice new behaviors.
3. Anchor to core values, not fixed traits.
4. Be transparent, but with boundaries.
5. Permit yourself to shed parts of your identity when the situation demands it.

Herminia Ibarra suggests that sometimes you must “fake it until you make it” — that is, step into behaviors that don’t yet feel completely authentic so that, with time, they become integrated.

In short: authenticity grows. It doesn’t arrive fully formed. The leader you are today is not the leader your company will need tomorrow.

How Being Yourself Can Ruin a Startup — The Mechanisms

Let’s walk through five specific ways enforcing rigid authenticity can undermine a startup’s health.

1. Decision paralysis and emotional overhang

If you feel obliged to always reflect your raw emotional state, you might hesitate to make decisions when unsure. You may wait until clarity emerges rather than acting. But startups often demand bold leaps under uncertainty.

2. Role mismatch

In the early days, you may be deeply product-facing or customer-facing. Later, you must become a team builder, strategist, and fundraising lead. Your early authenticity may not map cleanly to later demands.

3. Leadership inconsistency

Team expects the founder to stabilize emotions, show confidence, and model decisive action. If your “authentic” self is moody or vacillating, that becomes your pattern, and mistakes start to cascade into team morale and trust.

4. Brand identity overreach

Founders sometimes build personal brand identities (tone, style, beliefs) that become inseparable from the product. That locks the company behind the founder’s persona, making sales, acquisitions, or pivots awkward.

5. Inability to adapt to feedback

If you believe your core self is sacred, you may resist criticism, refuse to unlearn habits, or take feedback personally. Growth in startups demands adaptive humility, not a fixed ego.

From Rigid Self to Generative Founder: A Blueprint

First, start with self-awareness. You need to map your identity: the beliefs, styles, and habits you hold dear. Which ones serve the stage your startup is currently at? Which ones might hinder you later? Journaling, coaching, or structured reflection helps. (Ibarra encourages setting “learning goals,” not just performance goals, giving you license to experiment.)

Next, experiment in low-stakes settings. Try new behaviors in private or with trusted stakeholders before exposing them broadly. Promote a stretch role, offer a fresh communication style in one team meeting, shift tone in a small context. See how it feels, how others respond, and gradually bring forward the ones that work.

From there, align around values, not traits. Your values — integrity, curiosity, empathy, excellence — can remain stable even as behaviors evolve. If a new trait (say, more decisiveness) aligns with a core value (accountability), your shift doesn’t feel inauthentic — it feels like growth.

Communicate transitions transparently but intentionally. Explain to your team: “As we scale, I’m experimenting with different ways of showing up. I might act more directly in certain meetings; I’ll still hold our values of openness.” This positions change as evolution, not betrayal.

Always anchor transitions in feedback loops. Collect input from your team, board, and users. Check whether new behaviors are helping, not merely being “more you.” Course-correct. The goal isn’t performing authenticity,  it’s generative leadership that grows the company.

Finally, build guardrails. Some parts of “you” should stay intact (your core motivations, guiding values, moral boundaries). Other parts (communication style, tone, cadence, emotional expression) are more fungible. Know what you are willing to shift, and what remains non-negotiable.

Quotes & Concepts from HBR and Leadership Theory

One memorable depiction in The Authenticity Paradox describes Cynthia, who was promoted to lead a broader division. She addressed her new team with radical candor: “I want to do this job, but it’s scary, and I’ll need your help.” That admission, while honest, undercut her credibility as a confident leader. (From The Authenticity Paradox)

Another idea: Ibarra writes about “high self-monitors” — people who can adapt behaviorally to contexts without feeling fake. Such flexibility can be a strength; being a rigid “true-to-selfer” can be limiting.

Herminia Ibarra warns that if you only behave in ways that “feel natural,” you might never grow into the leader your future role demands. She suggests experimenting with atypical behaviors in lower-stakes settings to stretch your identity. These frameworks from HBR help us see that authenticity is not a fixed point, but a spectrum, and leaders need to calibrate where, when, and how to show themselves.

When Being Yourself Helps (So You Don’t Discard It Entirely)

Before you assume I’m against authenticity, I want to emphasize: parts of your natural self often are your greatest edge. The right balance is crucial.

When your personality gives you empathy, grit, contrarian insight, or moral clarity, those traits often become a core differentiator. When people feel your consistency over time, your “voice” becomes trustworthy.

But the difference is that such traits should modulate, not dictate. Use them as anchors, not handcuffs.

Wrap-up: Be Fluid, Not Static

Being yourself is a seductive ideal, especially when authenticity is treated as a moral virtue. But in the messy, scaling world of startups, that kind of rigid authenticity can hobble your ability to lead, evolve, and adapt.

A healthier mantra is: become your most generative self. That means anchoring in values, experimenting with new behaviors, evolving identity, and choosing what you let go of. The best founders don’t cling to their original selves; they grow into versions of themselves the startup needs next.

‍

Read - How To Stop Chasing Trends and Build Products That Matter